Japan’s Take on Human Rights

Posted on August 28th, 2007 in Customary Drivel, Politics, Unsolicited Commentary by Deas

I just finished reading a really interesting 3-part survey over at What Japan Thinks. If you’re interested, or if you want to know what I’m talking about, I encourage you to go take a look: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3. While Ken Y-N seems to think that a few folks will jump on it because it’s wide open for foreigner discrimination based criticism, I’m going to briefly talk about what I found interesting.

I guess you could say that Japan is headed slowly in the direction of modern Western liberalism. I’m not a big fan of the American variety, and by extent, I’m not a huge cheerleader for the entirety of Western liberalism. Looking at the multiple answers used in this survey, I feel like Ken Y-N hit it on the head when he wrote, “The key question is, of course, what do Japanese consider human rights?” Sure, they have defined them in the Constitution, but the survey to me had a distinctly different flavor.

The responses that surprised me (taken from multiple questions, in no particular order) were as follows:

- People staring, running away

- Opposition from others regarding marriage

- Problems being financially independent

- Rumors, others speaking ill of me

These things are not what I consider human rights. In fact, I get pretty annoyed when someone starts bandying about trying to enforce public behaviors that fix the so-called problem. This is an issue for me when dealing with Western liberalism: people are unbelievably hypersensitive! Now, don’t get me wrong. That doesn’t mean that I think people staring at you or running away from you, opposing you regarding marriage, or speaking ill of you are good things - or even socially acceptable. I simply feel that they fall outside of the realm of human rights. It aggravates me that in my country people cannot put up Nativity Scenes during Christmas anymore because they’re considered eyesores to people of differing religious beliefs, in the same way that hearing “Merry Christmas” is a startling affront. Nobody has the right to not be offended. That’s just silly. Similarly, I don’t feel like any laws or government intervention is called for in the case of people staring / running away, opposing marriage, or rumor mongering. People’s behavior is ultimately their responsibility.

I also don’t think that being financially independent is a human right. I think it’s a goal, not a condition to be taken for granted. And I don’t feel like its the government’s role to “help” in that case either. Surely society should step in and help our floundering individuals. But the individuals who are currently floundering would be mistaken to charge everyone else with breaking their inviolate human rights if they did not help out. In short, I draw the line between social ills and legally protected human rights. Anyway, it was an interesting survey. I just hope that Japan doesn’t encourage the same mentality of victimhood that is so pervasively nurtured in America and other Western countries. It seems to run hand in hand with this kind of thinking. And hey, once you have victims, you have court cases and an increasingly litigious culture. Please, Japan, think that over. I’d rather see you fix the actual problems, and not fight the windmills. (And this is coming from a fellow who gets stared at, run away from, and incorporated into rumors every day I live here.)

:-)

Possibly related posts: |Bad Move, BenQ. Bad Move.||Textbook Tripe||Metal Samurai||Beauty & the Beast||Plug-in Changes|

3 Responses to 'Japan’s Take on Human Rights'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Japan’s Take on Human Rights'.

  1. Alex said,

    on August 28th, 2007 at 12:20 pm

    Wait a second. Stop the presses.

    The way that I’m reading into this is that some people believe that, “Financial Independence is a human right that should be government supported.” Doesn’t “government support” imply the exact opposite of “independence”? “Support”. “Independence”. “Supported”. “Independent”. Which one is it?

    As far as I know, Japan is a culture where the children are supposed to support their parents in their old age. How is that a human rights issue? It seems a lot more domestic to me. It belongs in the “Family Ties Survey”.

  2. Ken Y-N said,

    on August 28th, 2007 at 12:38 pm

    Thanks for the linkage, Deas!

    Q4 indicates that 85% of people tend not to agree with human rights whingers, which hopefully means that we won’t see the situation in many parts of the world where you dare not say too many negative things about a person in case you get accused of being racist/sexist/fattist/whateverist.

    Of course, I’m sure someone will take Q4 and twist it to mean agreeing with Aso’s statement a couple of months ago about rights being like butter.

  3. Deas said,

    on August 28th, 2007 at 12:55 pm

    Alex - good point. Filial piety? Old hat. Governmental support? New sexy. Why? My guess would probably revolve around the post-bubble conspicuous consumer culture, the aging population of Japan (and consequential boom in the senior citizen services industry), and the role changes that individuals in a nuclear family are undergoing. But I wouldn’t honestly know what I’m talking about.

    Ken Y-N - You’re quite welcome for the links. I sure hope that those 85% keep their heads on straight. This is not to say that there are no violations of human rights going on in Japan, nor is it to condone those problems that do exist here. I just want people to remember that society is what needs to adjust - not the law books, unless there are specifically messed up laws. (I’d know nothing about that, again.) As for rights being like butter, I’d agree with it in this aspect: if you dump a whole lot on top of someone, they become much more slippery. Though I doubt it will make my popcorn taste any better.

Post a comment